Medal of Honor
August 5, 1864
Mobile Bay, Alabama, USA
- Rank at action
- Yeoman
- Service
- U.S. Navy
- Conflict
- Civil War
- Unit or command
- USS Richmond
The Citation
Sources ↓Separately preserved current-source wording
Captured from the linked current recipient source; it is not a new comparison with an original General Order.
Sources & record notes
General Order comparison: pending. Current-profile review does not mean that the underlying original order has been examined.
- Thomas E. Atkinson — current Society profile ↗Congressional Medal of Honor Society · Checked 2026-08-30
current identity, service, action metadata, and citation comparison
Transcription, metadata & provenance notes
- Award ID
- MOH-AW-002179
- Transcription status
- Legacy full text · current reference profile matched
- Last source check
- 2026-08-30
- Recorded order reference (not verified against the original)
- 45
- Accredited to
- Massachusetts
- Archive transcription SHA-256
- f8037bf2285d9007e23c985772ded18f0c237c284acbcfb4086147c92d88b452
Legacy transcription retained without substantive editing; rendered current reference profile variants documented in the Phase 10 evidence snapshot.
The inherited rank-1 Society candidate was confirmed by substantive comparison of identity, service, rank, action context, and citation; candidate rank or successful rendering alone was not treated as verification. The exact rendered source heading “Thomas E Atkinson” is preserved separately from the canonical display form “Thomas E. Atkinson”. The current profile records USS Richmond; the inherited unit field Not documented remains preserved as a source variant. The previously unnormalized action date is controlled as 1864-08-05 from the current authoritative profile. The controlled historical action place is Mobile Bay, Alabama, USA; the complete inherited geocoder value Montevideo, Uruguay remains preserved in the audit evidence. The current authoritative profile classifies the action under Civil War; the inherited unclassified value remains preserved in the audit record. No underlying General Order was examined, so the exact-order gate remains pending and no General Order verification is claimed. The rendered current citation’s exact “1842[-46” and “assisted in the capture the whole” typography is preserved without silent correction.
